Milwaukee Personal Injury Lawyer - All Topics - Latest Comments

A comment on Just Say No: Why Giving a Recorded Statement to Insurers May Be a Bad Idea

Joe Crumley — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:14:03 GMT

This is great advice.

A comment on FDA: Hydroxycut Recall - May Cause Liver Damage, Other Injuries

Gabrielle D'Alemberte — Wed, 20 May 2009 19:46:59 GMT

Didn't Hydroxycut get admonished years ago during the EPHEDRA ban? Am I wrong, was it a different company with almost identical name? If same company, how in the world have they continued to exist without greater supervision?

A comment on FDA: Hydroxycut Recall - May Cause Liver Damage, Other Injuries

Sailingwindward — Fri, 01 May 2009 20:01:24 GMT

I urge anyone that has been using this product to A: contact your physician B: contact a good attorney, these mutts at Hydroxicut have been hyping this product while all along knowing that the product was not only bogus in it's claims but harmful to consumers and deserve to be sued by any consumer who was effected by their product.

A comment on Workers Injured In Coal Dust Explosion Accident May Have Rights Beyond Worker's Compensation Benefits

John Astad — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:29:25 GMT

Any work environment that has combustible dust present needs to take from the OSHA playbook of Process Safety Management (PSM)where contractor training is required concerning the hazards of the work area. For instance contractors are not allowed in a petrochemical refinery unless they receive training on the hazards of flammable and potentially explosive material present.

Currently this sort of contractor training is not required at coal-fired energy plants and manufacturing facilities that have a combustible dust environment.

A comment on Workers Injured In Coal Dust Explosion Accident May Have Rights Beyond Worker's Compensation Benefits

David Lowe — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:55:28 GMT

We'll see if you are correct in your belief that these men received training about coal dust dangers as details about the investigation unfold. Based on your experience in the field of insurance and risk management, I think you would agree with me that they should be getting such training--which should reduce the frequency of these serious and oftentimes fatal accidents.

A comment on Workers Injured In Coal Dust Explosion Accident May Have Rights Beyond Worker's Compensation Benefits

Frank — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:00:16 GMT

Give me a break. Scaffold workers are trained in the work in that environment. Much of scaffold work is in the industrial arena. Methinks you might be looking for a client to sue somebody?
On is still in the hospital. Why don't you settle down a bit

A comment on Teens Hurt While Texting And Driving Under the Influence

Custom Volusia — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:34:36 GMT

They need to never be allowed to drive again. Ever. But hey, I'm sure that they are going to blame the phone maker, or maybe the car maker? Then they will sue. Pathetic.

A comment on Sales of Durom Cup Hip Socket Suspended

Michael Fairbairn Cordova — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:04:21 GMT

It sounds like the FDA should have done more investigation

A comment on Boy Fleeing Rottweiller Suffers Head Injury

Larry — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:13:25 GMT

For starters you cant outrun a dog. Next, most dogs have prey drive and will chase running things even if there is no intent to bite or harm it. I dont condone chaining your dog outside unsupervised for many reasons but I thinks its silly to try and blame the dogs owner for some teenager running into a tree.

A comment on LASIK SURGERY WARNINGS INSUFFICIENT

Dean Andrew Kantis — Fri, 02 May 2008 17:06:55 GMT

EMERGENCY FDA PANEL DISCUSSION POINTS- April 25th, 2008
Regarding Questions Arising About The Safety Of LASIK Eye Surgery…
By Dean Andrew Kantis, #2 Guest Speaker
Founder of: More ... " rel="nofollow">More ...

Good morning FDA Panel, Honored Guests, and Fellow Victims of the Flawed & Unpredictable LASIK Eye Surgical Procedure. My name is Dean Andrew Kantis, founder of LifeAfterLasik.com. For the past 9 years, I have spent $30,000 seeking restoration of my ruined vision only to find out there is NO CURE. Through my website, hundreds of victims have contacted me expressing their suicidal thoughts. Some have already committed suicide. It’s always the same story. I WAS LIED TO…The name says it all…LA...SICK!

When I began to speak out against LASIK years ago, I encountered a severe backlash. My own doctor, Nick Caro of Saint George in Chicago, tried to sue me for $2 million dollars for exposing his 40+ LAWSUITS. He then caused my family to get a divorce last year by harassing my wife attempting to get her fired from her nursing profession. My family has been harassed, has had death threats, and was lied to by this doctor, yet no one has punished him for his actions… Where was the FDA?

How is it that a doctor in this country can have 40+ lawsuits with NO KNOWN DISCIPLINARY ACTION? I feel that my “second opinion” doctors also lied to me, and I know they are the problem. How is a patient ever able to find out they have a problem if all of the “follow up” doctors lie to protect the original doctor?

After submitting complaints on these same doctors to the Department of Regulation, backed by solid evidence, I soon found all were DENIED. They all went up to “Probable Cause,” and there at the top sits a Medical Doctor in order to “cover a fellow doctor.” I feel like I have been RAPED…Where is the FDA?

Because of the Lies, I was unable to sue my doctor before the Statute of Limitations ran out. I guess that is why they all kept telling me that it would take 3, 4 maybe 5 years to fully heal. Sound familiar? I had to go online to find out the truth. I am now out of pocket for all medical costs, lost wages and for daily suffering.

I don’t know of any other procedure where hundreds of patients have created websites, warning the public about the unpredictability and corruption of LASIK surgery. I have outlined (5) KEY Emergency Points which should be thoroughly answered by this Panel, to ensure that the LASIK industry does not continue to DUPE the misinformed public.

Number One: What is the truth about the FLAP and Pupil Size? I was told that the flap created heals like a cut on your hand. But the truth is the flap NEVER heals, is unpredictable, and leaves the patient with a permanently scarred cornea. My pupils were measured off the charts at 9mm, yet my doctor told me “I was the perfect patient candidate for LASIK.” Just remember: Today’s happy 20/20 LASIK patient may regress and be tomorrow’s LASIK casualty driving a school bus picking up YOUR children. Oh yes, it effects every single one of you here today…

Number Two: What is “True Informed Consent”? I have submitted a complete pamphlet to this panel that gives the patient “True Informed Consent” with full color pictures illustrating the known side effects. Please consider mandating this pamphlet for yours is antiquated. Then educate the consumer on the Statute of Limitations so they know the “timeframe to sue their doctor” starts from the date of the procedure NOT the date of discovery. The Lying LASIK Doctors all know this…

Number Three: What constitutes a LASIK “Success?” I see double vision, halos, starbursts, fluctuating vision, and dry eye syndrome…Yet, I was told that I was a “Success.” Can you believe that? In order to believe the LASIK Industry’s reported satisfaction rate of 95%, you must accept these complications to be “acceptable normal outcomes.” That's the question... Do you believe a patient who has these problems to be a “Success” because the LASIK industry does! Shouldn’t “Patient Success” be decided by each individual patient however THEY define “Success?” How does this Panel define Success?

Number Four: What is a “Breach of the Standard of Care” for LASIK Doctors? The FDA has stated over and over that it is NOT their job to discipline doctors. Then who’s job is it because nobody seems to be doing it? I am out of a life that I once enjoyed because MONEY came first and my Well Being came last! I ask this Panel to hold the FDA responsible for reviewing the Ambulatory Code: 21 CFR 803.17 requiring all LASIK facilities since 1997 to report ALL adverse patient outcomes. I feel every LASIK facility in this country is in violation of this mandatory requirement, which should prompt a Class Action Lawsuit. If the CDRH has not even bothered to check the LASIK Centers in their own neighborhood, why did they all of a sudden set up “Sight Net” as a new initiative for their own incompetence? I do hope the media here today will investigate this.

Lastly, Number Five: What are the unforeseen Emotional Consequences of LASIK that Effects Every LASIK Doctor, Their Family Members, and Patients? I come today, at my own expense, to inform this Panel that you have a serious problem on your hands of very desperate, suicidal and angered patients that know their LASIK doctors lied to them and blame their doctors for ruining their precious lives. I ask this panel to set up an Emergency Hurt LASIK Patient Fund, in order to help patients with suicidal preventative therapy, ongoing medical expenses, legal representation, and lost wages. Please take immediate action to protect the end consumer who is paying you to protect them.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Dean Andrew Kantis
Founder
More ... " rel="nofollow">More ...